User talk:Dereck Camacho

Party shortnames

Please stop changing the shortnames templates to long names – they are called shortname templates for a reason! Cheers, Number 5 7 16:19, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tibet and China revisited

You might want to take a look at this edit--it is about Tibet and China.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 17:07, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Deputies of Costa Rica, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Secretariat and Partido Acción Ciudadana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gender identity in Costa Rica

Please stop providing inaccurate information about gender identity in article LGBT rights in Costa Rica. Gender changes on birth certificates or ID cards are not allowed in the country. The TSE resolution allows transgender people to legally change their names on ID cards according to their gender identity. We can't deny that is a huge step forward for a Central American country but gender change is still forbidden. The gender or "sex" marker is unchangeable by law. I provided sources in Spanish and English in the main article. Cheers Fhebynes (talk) 01:12, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help pls

Hello Im new here I found u on lgbt pages I posted and created new pages concerning lgbt wikiproject Can u please edit them accept them and link them to other languages and if a table of info is needed can u do it And can u please do the portal and the categories please How can i be part of lgbt wikiproject please I translated new pages hope u see and check them They are these https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?preload=Template%3AAfc+preload%2Fdraft&editintro=Template%3AAfC+draft+editintro&title=Draft:LGBT_Føroyar&create=Create+new+article+draft#See%20also AdamPrideTN (talk) 22:09, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother u Forget the first msg i delete it the draft But when i search for it in google i cant find it :/ Pls help bcos i want create it in my sandbix many other new pages that i translated This is the real page Can u see to it please https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_Føroyar AdamPrideTN (talk) 00:51, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning Recognition of same-sex unions in the Americas

Hi Concerning Recognition of same-sex unions in the Americas i saw that you edit the page before I'm sure there are important updates needeed in the section future legislatiin as the national bill in Mexico and the important updates in the constutuition and referendum in Cuba and that they are discussing it in the new draft constitution in Venezuela either by the end of 2018 or 2019 according to sources I would refer ylu to all respective recognition or lgbt rights pages of the countries Here are sources for Venezuela important update maybe you can added into its pages Plus cuba president backing same sex marriage Im new here and still learning so its better that the edit comes from you

Thank you

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/407066-new-cuban-president-says-he-supports-same-sex-marriage

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/09/cuban-president-miguel-diaz-canel-backs-sex-marriage-180917162537797.html

http://www.elimpulso.com/noticias/nacionales/en-el-2019-se-podria-legalizar-el-matrimonio-gay-en-venezuela-15sep

http://www.el-nacional.com/noticias/politica/nueva-constitucion-podria-legalizar-matrimonio-gay-venezuela_251900

AdamPrideTN (talk) 19:05, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AdamPrideTN I think you should added yourself, don't worry, one of the principles of Wikipedia is Wikipedia:Bold --Dereck Camacho (talk) 22:38, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atlantis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TheFamousPeople.com as a source

Hi Dereck Camacho. I noticed that you recently used thefamouspeople.com as a source for biographical information in Ilona Staller Please note that there is general consensus that thefamouspeople.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for such information. (Discussions here and here). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 16:26, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dereck Camacho. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dereck Camacho. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

United States involvement in regime change in Latin America

Hi there, I have temporarily hidden some content at United States involvement in regime change in Latin America, which you added in January. I was wondering if you could clarify it? The paragraph reads:

After left-leaning candidate Victor Raul Haya De La Torre of the American Popular Revolutionary Alliance won the Peruvian general election, 1962, CIA-supportedless the forces of moderation are able to bring about orderly change, radical leadership will probably get the chance to try its method." military commanders made a coup accusing Haya of voters' fraud, establishing a military junta under Ricardo Pérez Godoy.

I've read that several times and can't make sense of it. My best guess is that it's a combination of several sentences, and/or it's missing some words. If you could clarify, that would be great. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 01:55, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

National Restoration Party (Costa Rica)/meta/color listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect National Restoration Party (Costa Rica)/meta/color. Since you had some involvement with the National Restoration Party (Costa Rica)/meta/color redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 21:53, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hernán Solano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlos Alvarado (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Costa Rican elections

Notice you have some edition on that template , got some question on it.

1. Before 1848 , Costa Rica was a part of the Federal Republic of Central America , it shouldn't have parliamentary elections right ?

2. According to Spanish wiki , the first presidential election of Costa Rica is in 1849 , is this a general election too ?

Thank you. -- Comrade John (talk) 08:56, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A huge thanks on the big updates on the Costa Rican elections pages

Hello Derek. I want to immensely thank you on the edits you've been doing on the articles regarding Costa Rica's elections. The amount of effort you've put on translating the pre-1913 elections, as well as adding new info on each election -making them worthy of a read- is no easy task, but you've done a great job on making these professional articles. As you may've seen, I've been doing some work on the elections after 1949 (Second Republic) regarding the results; I'd love to do the same things on the First Republic elections but as I'm sure you know, we know almost nothing when it comes to the results of these elections; the most I have is Eduardo Oconitrillo's book (you know, the one we all Costa Rican election geeks have hahaha). If you know any source where I can get the results, or any other help you may need, do not hesitate on letting me know. My semester starts until March so I have plenty of time to kill.

Yours truly, --Maho713 (talk) 04:10, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Maho713, well yes I was planning to do it long time ago but until now I had time thanks to the holidays, and yes I have Oconitrillo's book in physical is incredibly insightful, but for the pre-1913 I was using this source from TSE, althoug is lacking data is some years. And yes I also noticed your work regarding the graphics in the elections very good indeed. Thank you. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 04:29, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liberal State, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metropolitan Opera House (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bundestag

Dear Dereck Camacho,

I have reverted your recent edit in the Bundestag article and wanted, to tell you the reasons: The diagram should do two things: It should show the political makeup of the parliament and the actual seating. The CDU and CSU are in fact two different parties, but in the Bundestag they join in one group (the CDU/CSU-group, often also called Union-group) and this is the only thing, which matters here. I think, the word "party" (Partei) does not appear once in the standing rules of the Bundestag, at least not with respect to the actual MPs and the session-procedures. The FDP-group is seated between the CDU/CSU-group and the AfD-group (although they are not happy with this), this is simply a fact. The four independent members should also not be shown seated together, partly because that would be misleading (three of them are fomer AfD-members -> right-wing/conservative and one is a former SPD-member -> rather left-wing) and because that's not the way, they are actually seated. The two AfD-members are seated behind the AfD-group and the former SPD-member is seated behind the SPD-group.Alektor89 (talk) 12:19, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Sock Puppet"/Bundestag diagram

You can stop the investigation, it was me: I forgot to log in, sorry. I think you have done the right thing now, hiding the diagram, which was not up date, regardless of the other questions. Now we should make a better diagram. I have set a link for an official seat plan of the BT on the articles talk page und would be glad to work with you on this issue. Alektor89 (talk) 10:21, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh alright Alektor89, I was about to place it lol. Ok let's do that. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 10:24, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know a tool we could use?Alektor89 (talk) 10:26, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only Paint lol. No, not really but is not that dificult. What I'm trying right now is to find the correct shape, once that is done the colors can be changed manually. Something like this but bigger and whiter, I think the first or second shapes may work. Is there a word in German that we can use to help the Google search? --Dereck Camacho (talk) 10:35, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The first is the best, I think. We should discuss this on the article's talk page from here on. Alektor89 (talk) 10:40, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alright --Dereck Camacho (talk) 10:41, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Bundestag diagram A.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bundestag diagram A.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:01, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Pact of Concord) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Pact of Concord.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice job on all these articles on Costa Rica! Keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:37, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Onel5969:, you're very kind. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 16:59, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries, esp. at 14th Dalai Lama

As admins called to a scene of conflict, like here, we like to be able to get the gist of what's going on without reading the entire talk page first. It would be nice if you could help facilitate this. Thank you. Samsara 23:03, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I will. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 00:21, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2020 elections looming closer

Hello Dereck, hope you've been having a good time. I'm sorry I've fallen silent in the last months regarding Wikipedia, university has been a major drain to my time, plus I got a new laptop because the other was so terrible I couldn't open more than a program at a time. Anyways, I'm here to remind you of the 2020 Costa Rican municipal election. We should start planning on how to write the article. Some issues (not necessarily bad ones) regarding this election, as you may know, is that there are over 100+ parties registered for this election, plus several coalitions and alliances; as well as the creation of Río Cuarto and several new districts (like Matambú, Reventazón), which help push forward the number of elected officials in 2020.

Election period officially starts on October, but almost all candidacies are ready, so we could start dealing with that as soon as possible. Thank you for being such a huge help on these articles regarding Costa Rica's election. Maho713 (talk) 21:16, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dereck Camacho? Maho713 (talk) 00:23, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Maho713, yes indeed, I already made the Spanish article, maybe could be use as a base. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 02:08, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dereck Camacho

Thank you for creating Kingdom of Nicoya.

User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very nice article, keep up the good work. Although the lead is missing.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:35, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I really don't know how to add a lead tho. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 05:48, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at WP:LEAD. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:00, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Input in discussion

Thank you for your confidence in asking me to comment on the discussion going on with regard to the edits at 14th Dalai Lama. I prefer to get involved once the discussion becomes more structured, for example, through a formal RFC. As the discussion is organized now, I don't see how it can come to a final conclusion. I should also like to remind you that many of these discussions could be prevented if the article is brought to GA level, and formally reviewed for that. I have found that this will attract many experienced editors, who are happy to help prevent the article from being vandalized by some 5G-country's political interests.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 09:29, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

Hello Dereck. Thanks for adding the legislative election results to the Costa Rican election infoboxes. Just a couple of things to note – when you add the legislative election infobox to the main infobox, you have to use the code:

| module = {{Infobox legislative election
| embed = yes

Otherwise it ends up looking a bit of a mess. Also, as the date, flag, last/next elections are included in the infobox header, you don't need to repeat it. You can also add another infobox election module to the presidential section so you can add the 'Presidential election' heading, and you can remove the presidential candidates receiving less than 5% of the vote. I've cleaned up 1990 Costa Rican general election and the others. Cheers, Number 5 7 15:25, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was wondering precisely why it ended up twisted like that. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 15:58, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of presidents of the Legislative Assembly of Costa Rica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Partido Acción Ciudadana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Respuesta

Lamento muchísimo, pero muchísimo que te hayan expulsado. Ese tema no valía la pena por una expulsión. Te voy a extrañar. Venite a editar a Wikiquote.--Jalu (talk) 13:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of National Socialist Party of Costa Rica for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Socialist Party of Costa Rica is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Socialist Party of Costa Rica until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Soman (talk) 18:17, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Es un poco extraño que tener que defenderse de una afirmación tan indeterminada como la que planteas, pero no, nunca he hablado sobre ti con terceras personas salvo las estrictamente necesarias cuando se produjo el asunto de tu bloqueo. La información sobre tus títeres que he compartido es la que públicamente está expuesta en la motivación de tu bloqueo en marzo en la página de discusión. Por cierto, no tengo Facebook. Montgomery (talk) 09:26, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias por tu respuesta Montgomery pero no lo veas como "tener que defenderte", sólo estaba preguntando justamente porque me pareció muy extraña la afirmación y quise confirmarla preguntándote, y sí, ciertamente que confirmé mi sospecha de que quien lo dijo es un mentiroso. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 11:09, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films about hebephilia has been nominated for deletion

Category:Films about hebephilia has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 04:53, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello, Dereck Camacho! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time.

Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Me-123567-Me --Dereck Camacho (talk) 07:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bundestag diagram

Hey Dereck Camacho! Yes, we already had this discussion. The problem is, the diagram is not up to date anymore, some more MP's have left their groups and now sit as non-inscrits - and I admit that I was lazy and made an update with the diagram tool some months ago, which up to some days ago everyone seemed to be ok with. I was quite sure (but maybe I am mistaken!) that you yourself suggested at the time to make a diagram in the order of "government - opposition", because you didn't want it to follow the seating order - and that's exactly why I did it that way, because I still think it's better than an arbitrary right-left scheme, where we would first have to discuss endlessly which party in Germany is more right or more left than which other party...One could also express it differently: I am willing, simply out of convenience, to forego the reproduction of the exact seating arrangement and to go for the variant "diagram in the order government-opposition", in each case from the largest to the smallest faction (which I remember you advocating, or at least consider feasible). The fact that you, of all people, do not agree with this now comes as something of a surprise to me. Would you please let me do the edit or make a different proposal. The diagram, that is now in the article, is simply outdated an needs to be changed. Alektor89 (talk) 15:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alektor89 I think you are missremembering something. If you re-read the discussion I wasn't oppose of a diagram showing the seating. I was oppose to an arch diagram showing the seating as it will be missleading. I was in favor of a diagram showing the seating with the shape of the hemicycle. Now, if you want to use a Westimister-style diagram showing "government - opposition" I will be ok with that (although Germany does not uses a Westmister system). But I don't see how an arch diagram can show what group is opposition and what group is government. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 15:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Dereck Camacho, I have answered you on the article's talk page, where we should continue the discussion for the convenience of other users.Alektor89 (talk) 15:30, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 15:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rise of the Evangelical Church in Latin America for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rise of the Evangelical Church in Latin America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rise of the Evangelical Church in Latin America until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CDLCR (talk) 17:27, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2022 Costa Rican general election

Hello, Dereck Camacho,

Thank you for creating 2022 Costa Rican general election.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please change the dates in references to English language (see errors in ref list - the error is that the dates are in a different language)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 13:21, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Lucifer2000 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lucifer2000. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:1963 New Zealand parliament.svg

The file File:1963 New Zealand parliament.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Essentially the same as c:File:1954 nz parliament.svg, so moving this to commons would be redundant. Suggest creating a redirect on commons and deleting the local version.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:1960 New Zealand parliament.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1960 New Zealand parliament.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:1963 New Zealand parliament.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1963 New Zealand parliament.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Conservative wave

The article Conservative wave has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE. It is just a random listing of centre and right-wing governments in Latin America, with no clear context of what would tie them all together as a unity. Governments change or stay in elections always because of local factors, people do not vote the left or the right according to what happens at some other country. The lack of clear temporal boundaries does not help either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cambalachero (talk) 16:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Conservative wave for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Conservative wave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conservative wave until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cambalachero (talk) 17:46, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Spiritism in Costa Rica

The article Spiritism in Costa Rica has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks like this is an improper WP:POVFORK of Kardecist spiritism. No real clear basis for having this article separate from that one.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jps (talk) 19:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Spiritism in Costa Rica for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spiritism in Costa Rica is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spiritism in Costa Rica until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

jps (talk) 17:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]